In the August issue of the ABA Journal, Scott Turrow makes a passionate argument for why The Billable Hour Must Die. He’s not alone in thinking that the future of the legal profession cannot be dependent upon the zero sum game of time x dollars. (See the April 4, 2007 post to this blog.) But Turrow asks a new question: Is the billable hour ethical? Turrow cites Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules which provides that “a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation reflects a concurrent conflict of interest,” which the rule defines as “a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by . . . a personal interest of the lawyer.” Isn’t there a clear conflict of interest whenever a lawyer’s economic interests favor prolonging representation and the client’s favor shortening the same?
Law Practice Management
The death of the billable hour.
- “Real change, enduring change, happens one step at a time.” – Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Like the law, happiness is a practice.
“Now’s the time not to be the same.”
– Kevin O’Keefe, CEO and Founder of LexBlog
- COVID-19 UPDATE: 1)Documenting Business Interruption, 2)Employers Can Provide Tax-Free Disaster Payments To Employees
- Five things your law firm can learn from inconsistent coronavirus messaging.
- 50 Lessons for Happy Lawyers (2)
- 50 Lessons for Lawyers (10)
- Client Development (4)
- Continuous Improvement (21)
- Heath & Wellness (31)
- Law Office Management (10)
- Law Practice Management (32)
- Leadership (31)
- Marketing (53)
- Practice Management (6)
- Self Management & Productivity (8)
- Sharpen the Saw (4)
- Social Media (3)
- Time Management (34)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Web/Tech (10)